Sonam Wangchuk: The Foreign-funded agitator fueling chaos in Ladakh

Amid the escalating protests in Ladakh, where four lives were lost and over 80 people injured in violent clashes on September 24, 2025, climate activist Sonam Wangchuk has emerged not as a champion of the people, but as a shadowy figure whose financial web of deceit reveals him to be a foreign agent hell-bent on destabilizing India.
Masquerading as an education reformer and environmental crusader, Wangchuk has exploited public grievances over statehood and the Sixth Schedule to incite mob fury, drawing dangerous parallels to the Arab Spring and Nepal’s Gen Z uprisings—rhetoric that the Ministry of Home Affairs has directly blamed for provoking the deadly unrest.
His provocative hunger strike, launched on September 10 despite ongoing government dialogues yielding key concessions like 84% reservations for Ladakhi tribes and official language status for Bhoti and Purgi, wasn’t about genuine advocacy; it was a calculated ploy to sabotage progress and amplify foreign-backed narratives of division in this strategically vital border region.
Wangchuk’s credibility crumbles under scrutiny of his financial empire, built on a labyrinth of undeclared accounts, illicit foreign inflows, and blatant violations of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA), 2010. These aren’t mere oversights—they’re the hallmarks of an operative siphoning global funds to erode India’s sovereignty from within.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has been probing him and his institutions for over two months, triggered by a Ministry of Home Affairs reference, uncovering a pattern of deceit that reeks of external manipulation. 1 On September 25, the Union Home Ministry revoked the FCRA license of his flagship NGO, the Students’ Educational and Cultural Movement of Ladakh (SECMOL), citing repeated breaches including misuse of foreign grants for “studies on the sovereignty of the country”—a red flag for anti-national intent.
Even more damning, Wangchuk’s recent visit to Pakistan on February 6, 2025, is now under CBI lens, raising alarms about ties to adversarial forces eager to exploit Ladakh’s tensions with China and Pakistan.
observers have labeled him a “foreign-backed agitator,” propped up by entities like the Ford Foundation and George Soros-linked networks, turning Ladakh’s legitimate aspirations into a powder keg for broader instability.
As one X user aptly noted, “Sonam Wangchuk is an activist who receives funding from foreign forces to destabilize India,” echoing widespread calls for his arrest as a separatist pawn.
Key Revelations of Financial Misconduct: A Trail of Foreign Influence
Wangchuk’s network—spanning NGOs and private firms—operates like a shadow economy, funneling opaque foreign cash to fuel his agitprop while flouting Indian laws. Here’s the breakdown:
i. Himalayan Institute of Alternatives Ladakh (HIAL)
ii. Donations skyrocketed from ₹6 crore in Assessment Year (AY) 2023-24 to over ₹15 crore in AY 2024-25, a surge unexplained by any verifiable on-ground impact.
Of its seven bank accounts, four remain undeclared to authorities—a deliberate veil over illicit flows. Most egregiously, HIAL pocketed over ₹1.5 crore in foreign remittances without FCRA registration, breaching Section 11 of the Act and preceding its application.
For FY 2020-21 and 2021-22, it falsely reported zero foreign earnings despite inflows of ₹23 lakh and ₹47.6 lakh, violating the Companies Act (Sections 129, 447) and IPC Section 467 for forgery. Local donations were funneled into its FCRA account, defying Section 17.
Then, a whopping ₹6.5 crore was shuttled to his private entity, Sheshyon Innovations Private Limited (SIPL), ostensibly to “absorb excess reserves” from years of phantom projects—classic money laundering masquerading as philanthropy.
Students’ Educational and Cultural Movement of Ladakh (SECMOL)�This 1988-founded outfit, once hailed for education reform, now stands exposed with nine accounts, six undeclared.
Between FY 2020-21 and 2022-23, domestic funds were dumped into its FCRA account, flouting Section 17. It accepted ₹4.93 lakh from Swedish group Framtidsjorden for “youth-awareness” programs, but the ministry flagged portions as probing national sovereignty—prohibited under Section 12(4).
In FY 2021-22, Wangchuk personally deposited ₹3.35 lakh into its FCRA account, a direct personal infusion banned by law.
The FCRA cancellation on September 25 seals its fate as a foreign conduit.
4
iii. Sheshyon Innovations Private Limited (SIPL)
�Launched in 2023 with Wangchuk and his wife Geetanjali JB as directors, this “profitable” venture reeks of a shell to launder HIAL’s surplus. On a ₹9.85 crore turnover in AY 2024-25, its net profit plunged to 1.14% from 6.13% the prior year— a suspicious dive amid the ₹6.5 crore influx from HIAL, including tainted foreign portions.
Of its three accounts, two are hidden from regulators, underscoring the opacity shielding these transfers.
Sonam Wangchuk’s Personal Finances: The Nerve Center of Foreign Meddling
�Wangchuk controls nine personal accounts, eight undeclared, with several brimming with foreign remittances totaling ₹1.68 crore from 2018 to 2024. Between 2021 and March 2024, he wired ₹2.3 crore abroad to obscure entities—prime money laundering territory, especially as he funneled foreign cash into joint and personal holdings, eviscerating FCRA prohibitions. The CBI summoned him, but he dodged, while teams raided HIAL and SECMOL for records from 2020-2024.
Wangchuk’s retort? Claiming these were “service fees” from UN, Swiss, and Italian partners—yet discrepancies in audited reports and undeclared channels tell a grimmer tale of evasion.
The CSR Hypocrisy: Biting the Hand That Funds Him
Wangchuk’s barbs against India’s corporate sector ring hollow when you peel back the layers of his funding. Despite his public disdain for “corporate greed,” his entities have gorged on massive CSR infusions from giants like central PSUs and multinationals—tens of crores funneled under the guise of eco-projects and education.
This isn’t principled activism; it’s opportunistic grifting, where he lambasts the very system padding his coffers, all while channeling foreign scraps to stoke anti-India fervor. As one commentator put it on X, he’s a “conniving, foreign-funded agent with a cold ambition to break India.”
Wangchuk’s facade as a “people’s representative” is shattered. His foreign entanglements— from Pakistan jaunts to FCRA fraud—paint him as a destabilizing force, weaponizing Ladakh’s youth against the nation that nurtured his rise.
With CBI closing in and the FCRA axe fallen, the question isn’t if he’ll face justice, but how deep the foreign rot runs. India must root out such agents before they fracture its borders further.
The Gen Z of Ladakh deserve dialogue, not this Soros-scripted sabotage.



