NATO’s Flawed Report Says Pakistan Wants Peace Deal In Afghanistan, India Against...

NATO’s Flawed Report Says Pakistan Wants Peace Deal In Afghanistan, India Against It


NATO’s Flawed Report Says Pakistan Wants Peace Deal In Afghanistan, India Against It

A biased report of the NATO Defence College in Rome gives prominence to a country like Pakistan by stating that Pakistan doesn’t want the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan, pushing Taliban to make concessions for a political deal but outside players like India are against an interim government. This is a very flawed report because NATO just cannot stop itself from equating Pakistan with the Asian Giant India.

Imagine the Joke of the Century which terms India as an outside player in the affairs of Afghanistan chaos created by “ very inside “ players dropping in from North American Continent and Europe. History of Afghanistan says that it has been under other powers for a very long period. However powers like Alexander, Persians, British, Russians and Americans have been in Control for fleeting seconds only. Whereas Afghanistan has been part of India for long under and ruled from Hastinapur, Patliputra, Agra and Delhi for very very long periods.

The 104-page grossly flawed report is part of the NATO Defence College’s NDC Research Papers Series that sheds light on various issues related to Afghanistan following the US announcement to withdraw troops from the war-torn country. Chapters on Pakistan and India have been written, respectively, by Siegfried O. Wolf and Rahul Roy-Chaudhury, and defence experts from UK’s defence think-tanks IISS and RUSI have contributed. When will such reports stop equating Pakistan with India ?

The paper says that regional powers agree that the conflict must be resolved through a political process; most advocate some form of power sharing with the Taliban but do not want a full Taliban takeover. The report goes on to say that Pakistan accepts that Taliban would have a significant role, but in coalition with other political forces; Russia – and probably China – also support replacing Ashraf Ghani with a more inclusive interim government in which the Taliban play a role.

Given the Indian government’s refusal to talk publicly to the Taliban, according to the report, the country also remains largely marginalized in the international talks surrounding the peace process. Two decades on from the events of 9/11 and a prolonged war, Pakistan stands out as the most influential regional actor, by virtue of its cultural, historical and economic ties with Afghanistan, and its long association with the Taliban, according to the report…….imagine NATO chaps saying this for a “country” which is just 70 years old and disregards thousands of years of historical ties ! Strange.

The report says: “Iran is a powerful regional player with extensive interests in the country, and the role of Afghanistan’s northern neighbours, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, is often underestimated. China has a short border with Afghanistan, but operates more as a great power in the region and as a close ally of Pakistan. Russia still views Afghanistan as bordering its sphere of influence in Central Asia and as a potential source of insecurity. India also plays an important role, primarily driven by rivalry with Pakistan. The Gulf States no longer have the close ties with the Taliban that they once enjoyed, but still have important interests in Afghanistan.”

So Iran us a powerful regional player for NATO and India is a “ marginalized “ power. Which world is NATO talking about?

It says that a recent UK parliamentary report called for a “binding international commitment by all of Afghanistan’s neighbours to non-intervention” but such calls are unrealistic as Iran and Pakistan will become more – not less – enmeshed in Afghanistan’s politics and economy after a US/NATO withdrawal. The report said that there is broad acknowledgement that only a political agreement can resolve the conflict, and most regional powers – with the notable exception of India – believe that any peace deal will only be viable if it involves a share of power for the Taliban. On the other hand, no regional power – including Pakistan – wants a return of the Taliban to a complete monopoly of power.

The report noted: “Pakistan has been a key driver and supporter of the US-Taliban agreement and the Doha talks, viewing them as the most likely route to achieve a political settlement that reflects its long-term geopolitical goals. Pakistan is clear on what it wants to avoid: a nationalist, pro-Western, and pro-Indian government that would pose a strategic challenge and be an irritant in bilateral relations, for example over the disputed Afghan-Pakistan frontier.”

“Pakistan also doesn’t want to see a full Taliban takeover that could spark off a deeper civil war and in 2020-21 Pakistan has been reaching out to non-Pashtun forces to enhance its leverage. It has also attempted to improve ties with Kabul. It says that Taliban have developed relations with other powers in the region and even if it wanted to, Pakistan may not be able to persuade the movement to compromise on key issues – such as ties to Al-Qaeda or a reduction in violence – or on the shape of a potential interim administration.

On India, Rahul Roy-Chaudhury writes that India has been a major “development” partner of Afghanistan but the number of India’s ongoing projects have also been currently reduced due to the deteriorating security environment in Afghanistan. The report says that India has held talks with Taliban in recent years at several levels but it remains marginalised in international diplomacy on the peace process with the Taliban

These views of the unrealistic report are challenged by non-Taliban regional power like Iran that may be willing to accept a power-sharing arrangement if its interests are protected but the Asian Giant India remains opposed to an interim government, because it will lead to a Taliban takeover and embed Pakistan’s influence.

 However presently India is not ready to back the Ghani administration with direct interventional military support. Indirect support in terms of training to Afghan Police and Afghan military together with equipment is already being provided.

The government in India will never agree with such biased views. India has invested a lot of time and effort in Afghanistan. India may have to wait for a bit more time but there After all these extra regional powers meddling in Asia will have to take their cue from India and finally get out from the region.